On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A problem comes from the name "natural" that to most people (including > mappers) carries a meaning that excludes some meanings accepted in the > OSMwiki definition. > For this reason it would be better to use a tag that carries no distorted > meaning, say landcover=trees for instance. > I can definitely agree with this. landcover=trees carries no weird meanings unlike natural=wood (natural? man-made?). I can accept using landuse=forest for land that is used for forestry-related uses (like production of timber or a national forest), but for everything that is covered by a dense group of trees, landcover=trees seems the way to go.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
