> Le 31 oct. 2017 à 10:18, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> A problem comes from the name "natural" that to most people (including
> mappers) carries a meaning that excludes some meanings accepted in the
> OSMwiki definition.
> For this reason it would be better to use a tag that carries no distorted
> meaning, say landcover=trees for instance.
I can see any problem with "natural=wood" as there is a "natural=tree_row" not
natural in the reality. Same of "leisure=sport" for a, say, tennis training
camp (not very much leisure there ;-) ).
Let us the mappers know there are tags that could not be as transparents they
wish.
We don't need a "landcover" for a very limited purpose : keep one type of
landuse off overlapping others.
Creating a new tag could be confusing and time-costing.
"Landuse=forest" may remain for large forests off the inhabited places.
Christian Rogel
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
