On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 10:38:01PM +0000, Pierre Béland wrote: > I dont know what is picavet. But I dont think thatKite, or balloon or > similar flying objects could cover rapidly and systematically a > rectangular area, be stabilized and produce images of quality. > > The fix wings are still expansive but can produce rapidly very precise > imageries and elevation models. It would be interesting to examine the > faisability to develop such a project including both hardware and open > source software.
From my estimated the cost is around 300€ starting from zero. Plus a Camera
with something like CHDK - Given that you crash your first experiments
it gets a little more expensive.
Thats for the flying gear.
I am now more interested in stuff like which camera, focal length,
stride width, aperture, resolution on ground, stitching the images or
georeferencing the individual images. Producing the geotiffs, creating a
WMS server etc.
I have some software tools up in my head like Hugin (Image stitching and
lense correction), QGis for Georeferencing the images although the stuff
i saw is pretty complicated.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
