21. Nov 2018 15:17 by tomasstrau...@gmail.com <mailto:tomasstrau...@gmail.com>:
> But I see no objective reasons why this should be the case in the > data. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_Rule <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_Rule> > Data could represent all sides. No. This way we will end with micronation nonsenses like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micronation <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micronation> or worse For more specific case see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kugelmugel <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kugelmugel> > I've given examples how to do > so, but it was proven again that there was NO ATTEMPT to have a > resolution which would be acceptable to MORE people. Hint 1: titles like "OSMF silently sides with Russia" are poor way to convince others that you have a good idea. Hint 2: before starting controversial disussion please check previous discussions on a given topic
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
