Mar 1, 2019, 11:48 AM by [email protected]:

>
>
>
> Am 01.03.2019 um 10:48 schrieb Mateusz      Konieczny:
>
>>
>>
> .....
>  
>
>> c) I recommend doing this, I        tried mailing Mapbox about their 
>> license-breaking
>> hiding attribution but at        first their responded claiming that OSBL 
>> allows that,
>> after quoting that part of        them they went back to not responding
>>
>> d) what would be our options        for especially stubborn ones? DMCA filed 
>> by OSMF?
>>
>
> ....
>
>
> Just to be clear on this, the OSMF licences use of OSM data and      
> derivates directly to the "end customer". In this case to the      companies 
> that are using a third parties infrastructure to produce      rendered maps 
> from OSM data. So while we can stipulate an ethical      and moral obligation 
> of the third party to enforce attribution      requirements, legally it is an 
> obligation of the      website/service/whatever operator that is a customer 
> of the third      party. 
>
>
Yes, I know that. But I guess that while it would have many harmful side 
effects 
and it should be used as a last resort I guess that Mapbox would react if they 
customers would start 
getting DMCAs.

And anyway Mapbox itself is also hosting some maps that on mobile refuse to show
proper attribution (despite that it would take less space than Mapbox logo that 
is
displayed), so their example pages can be DMCAed.

Additional question - who can file DMCA. AFAIK only OSMF can do that and 
individual
mappers are unable to do it, right?


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to