Mar 1, 2019, 12:31 PM by si...@poole.ch: > > > > Am 01.03.2019 um 12:01 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: > >> >> >> >> Mar 1, 2019, 11:25 AM by >> si...@poole.ch <mailto:si...@poole.ch>>> : >> >>> >>> And specifically on the issue with Mapbox customers, one of the >>> results of the 2014 discussions was this statement by Mapbox >>> >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/21847 >>> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/21847>>>> which a) >>> states that the attribution is be default expanded, and b) that >>> should be the case ">>> whereever possible" >>> which in our >>> understanding>>> >>> limits the use of a default collapsed >>> attribution to cases where it is physically impossible to show the >>> expanded version, for example very small map snippets. In 2014 we >>> felt that this was acceptable (we don't have an formal statement >>> on this iirc), and I would go out on a limb and say that it would >>> still be considered a reasonable guideline.>>> >>> >>> >> This is at best outdated. >> >> > We've not received any communication from Mapbox that would indicate that. > Well, Mapbox in their own map example is on mobile hiding attribution behind nonobvious button so apparently Mapbox decided to not announce that.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
