Apr 18, 2019, 1:58 AM by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 17. Apr 2019, at 22:03, Mateusz Konieczny <>> matkoni...@tutanota.com >> <mailto:matkoni...@tutanota.com>>> > wrote: >> >> Among other popular wikipedia links >> >> "wikipedia='de:Stolpersteine'", >> >> are also clearly invalid >> > > > this one is not clearly invalid, you could take a stance that the article is > about the whole of this artwork, and as it is distributed all parts would get > the tag (or do you propose a relation for it to have one object for the > whole?). I agree it is clearly redundant though. > I considered Stolpersteine as a monument type, not a single distributed monument. Though Wikipedia has "As of 23 October 2018, 70,000 Stolpersteine have been laid making the Stolpersteine project the world's largest decentralized memorial." so now I am less sure. I would certainly consult German community before starting some sort of an automatic removal process (with sole exception of possible reverting of undiscussed mechanical edits). I will move de:Stolpersteine to "technically incorrect, could be moved to using site relation but involving site relations is almost never improvement, so lets consider it as an acceptable tagging" in my list, to pl:Wrocławskie krasnale en:Urban Hydrology en:Lunar Society Moonstones and other similar situations.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
