On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:23 AM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> wrote:
> Pull requests work and that is exactly scheme used now - by iD, JOSM, > Vespucci, StreetComplete etc. > Ahem, actually no, they do not -- as demonstrated by the recent scandal with iD presets. Community is disconnected from developers. > "Accept all changes from Wiki" or "Treat changes from wiki as submitter > PR" is unlikely to be considered as preferable. > Preferable by whom? The devs? See my previous point -- there is currently a clear disconnect, and storing presets in the data items is a proposed way out of that disconnect. More importantly, I am still not sure I understand what it is that you object to. A pull request is created by a user who proposes a certain change to a preset. If the presets are stored in the data items, the process is nearly the same -- a user proposes a change to a preset, except that they do it in a wiki, and a bot translates that proposal into the github's pull request. Same process, but it becomes easier to analyze/validate/discuss such changes, and to show them in other wiki pages for everyone to see. On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:23 AM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> wrote: > > 10 Jun 2019, 23:07 by yuriastrak...@gmail.com: > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:08 PM Mateusz Konieczny > > Also, "edit on Wiki automatically and silently starts equivalent of PR" is > also not going to work. > > > Why a pull request won't work? > > > Pull requests work and that is exactly scheme used now - by iD, JOSM, > Vespucci, StreetComplete etc. > > "Accept all changes from Wiki" or "Treat changes from wiki as submitter > PR" is unlikely to be > considered as preferable. > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk