To illustrate where this discussion has gone awry please consider a rendering using 10 data sources all licensed on ODbL terms (in real life it is not uncommon to have multiple dozens of different sources, so 10 is not a high number). The ODbL does not, nor does any other open licence, intend for such a product not to be possible because of the practicalities of providing simultaneously visible attribution of all sources all the time.
Am 09.09.2019 um 00:10 schrieb Joseph Eisenberg: > The attribution should be at least (c)OpenStreetMap, but it's fine to > give more detail like: > > 1. Using just the coastal shoreline in the basemap: > > (c) OtherDataSource, coastline (c)OpenStreetMap > > 2. Using OSM basemap in 1 along with roads, rivers and water bodies > > <other data> (c) OtherDataSource, basemap (c)OpenStreetMap > > 3. Using OSM basemap with 2 and buildings > > (c)OpenStreetMap, <other data> (c) OtherDataSource > > It seems simpler to just clearly state "you need to include > (c)OpenStreetMap on the map if you use OpenStreetMap" rather than > making more complicated rules. > > - Joseph Eisenberg > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
