On Sunday 08 September 2019, Simon Poole wrote: > > But in any case the guideline refers to the "visible map rendering". > At least in conventional use of the term, aerial imagery is not a > map, but if you so which we could surely add a definition for "map" > that makes it clear that we are referring to the rendering of map > vector data and similar and not image-like layers.
I think i have made my point that your concept of quantifying data fractions is based on a very fragile understanding of the granularity of the data involved - not a good basis for any kind of universal rules. Yes, you can try patching the holes in this concept by re-defining what a map is but at the end of the day to define a relative fraction of OSM data use as a quantitative cutoff for an 'attribution light' is just a bad idea IMO. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
