sent from a phone
> On 4. Aug 2020, at 16:53, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > > but it isn't a good measure of what the OSMF should spend its money on, weere > applying an 80/20 rule is likely to be far more appropriate. > As I have said, I’m fine with spending 2500 on a dead proprietary technology because some long term contributors rely on it and because it’s part of our legacy, but only because I’m not applying an 80/20 rule, but an 99/1 rule ;-) With an 80/20 approach it would not make sense because there are already a lot of alternative editing possibilities available. > . Definitely nobody is going to embark on the multi-million undertaking that > writing and bringing to production a new editor is > you are suggesting that the PL2 development is worth several millions of dollars/euros/pounds? Let’s remain serious. Several millions would be tens of man-years. Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
