Le 14.03.23 à 13:45, Pierre Béland via talk a écrit :
I imported the osm metadata using overpass
can youu share it to avoid having to make it again :)
Simple Building duplicates from the same contributor are the easy ones to
correct.
yes, on the condition that you can easily detect when the contributor
wanted to represent a simple building ?
I imagine that a first criterion could be the absence of the level layer
tag (which we see badly used in one of your examples) and perhaps
building:level
osm type nb of quaddup objects
way 1 838 3352
maybe best to focus on that first
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13965412 that contains way/677238859
with inner role to 6 relations that represent each level of the building.
commented https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118924402
one building is represented with one way (6 nodes) and 3 relations in which
this way has role=outer.
way 1137657546 building=cabin
Relation : 15538065 building=yes
Relation : 15538064 building=yes
Relation : Horsnæs Fangststation (15538063) place=locality
ccommented https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133075628
These are four different relations.
-10326414 -10326413 -10326412 -10326411
They all share these 2 buildings as outer members.
48002128 505561207
what's strange is to have managed to do this with iD
but that's three mistakes :
- duplicate
- the garage is not a house
- the address in Switzerland represents an entrance door and by
extention the building if this one has only one address. if the no. 7
represents the house, the garage does have the no. 7 (but probably the
number 7.1 which is rarely tagged in osm)
Regards,
Marc
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
