links of interest:

http://incubator.apache.org/felix/ - osgi impl currently in incubation

There also was some talk last fall about about harmony
(http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/) jumping on the osgi bandwagon
too but I'm unable to find any recent references.

Geoff

On 4/26/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eclipse took osgi bundles and added contributions to make Eclipse plugins.
>
> Nothing says that one can't take osgi bundles and add HM
> configurations and the services cool threaded services models there
> too.
>
> osgi has a service model already, very simple one it would be possible
> to add HMiness 'cuz ogsi does not mandate anywhere how those services
> are implemented or configured.
>
> Plus osgi has all the lifecycle, hot redeploy, provision over the wire
> stuff that HM curently lacks.
>
> The only thing that make osgi bundles challenging in the classloader model.
>
> Geoff.
>
> On 4/26/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey, them's fightin' words.  You mean it's called HiveMind?!?! :-)
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Geoff Longman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 2:03 PM
> > To: Tapestry development
> > Subject: Re: Tapestry 5 progress
> >
> > it's called osgi
> >
> > G
> >
> > On 4/26/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hm. Wouldn't it be neat if Tapestry had a runtime environment that
> > > promoted the use of plugins to extend the available features.  Sort of
> > > a hive of plugins working together, each minding its own portion of
> > > the application ... :-)
> > >
> > > On 4/26/06, Brian K. Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > >
> > > > lol - Example: I use Eclipse. It's not a "source code editor / syntax
> > > > highlighter / code completer", it's a framework that has the JDT - THAT
> > > > does those functions. It also doesn't integrate with SVN. Subclipse does
> > > > that. So I don't believe Tapestry should do what I'd like - I think
> > > > there should be a framework that uses Tapestry for what Tapestry does,
> > > > but also has more 'plugins'. If you've ever used Vignette's StoryServer
> > > > (or others out there), it's the same concept.
> > > >
> > > > "do it whenever, I don't care"... yeah - never heard that before. :-D
> > > >
> > > > Geoff Longman wrote:
> > > > > On 4/26/06, Brian K. Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > You know... I think (as much as I'd like to see this just 'built in')
> > > > > this is a lot like saying "I'd like my source code editor/syntax
> > > > > highlighter/code completer to have source code integration" - it
> > doesn't
> > > > > belong. What you need is an "Eclipse/Idea/Pick your IDE" that
> > integrates
> > > > > the two.
> > > > >
> > > > >> The above paragraph is in some English-like language that look
> > > > >> *exactly* like English but runs through my brain without computing
> > > > >> into anything at all ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > >> Probably the similar to the language my wife uses to mean "do it
> > > > >> yesterday or I will make your life a living hell" when she says "do
> > it
> > > > >> whenever, I don't care."
> > > > >
> > > > >> What does "I'd like my source code editor/syntax
> > > > >>  highlighter/code completer to have source code integration" mean?
> > > > >
> > > > >> Geoff
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmmm... Yeah... That would be an interesting endeavor. Time to work
> > out
> > > > > something like this... Take that IDE to application-land.
> > > > >
> > > > > James Carman wrote:
> > > > >>>> It might be worth looking into OSCache for this.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > > > >>>> From: Brian K. Wallace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 2:20 AM
> > > > >>>> To: Tapestry development
> > > > >>>> Subject: Re: Tapestry 5 progress
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Works for me. Plenty of growing room for 4 left anyway, right
> > Jesse? ;-)
> > > > >>>> I'm just hoping to get documentation (*ugh*) and tooling (Spindle)
> > up to
> > > > >>>> speed before 5 hits. (feed the masses and all that :-))
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> In speaking of performance... (I'm off in dream land here, I
> > know... but
> > > > >>>> I like it there sometimes)
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Many moons ago, there was talk of a 'tool' /'utility' that would
> > > > >>>> basically spider a Tapestry app and get all the generated HTML
> > resulting
> > > > >>>> in basically a statically generated site. This helps tremendously
> > when
> > > > >>>> you're running behind a web server that's tuned to serve static
> > content
> > > > >>>> - it's what they do and they do it pretty well with no overhead
> > past
> > > > >>>> itself (meaning no java, no db, etc). I'd like to see if we can't
> > add
> > > > >>>> some sort of 'cache' attribute to the HTML (somewhere) that would
> > allow
> > > > >>>> Tapestry to perform this type of "wait, it says to cache it - i've
> > > > >>>> already generated it, I'll just grab that and use it" processing.
> > This
> > > > >>>> would also allow Tapestry to build on first access but write out
> > the
> > > > >>>> generated HTML so the next time a request comes in for it, the web
> > > > >>>> server would find it first (outside the mapping for Tapestry).
> > Granted
> > > > >>>> this would only work for pages that were "cache=true" and had no
> > dynamic
> > > > >>>> components inside it, but for a lot of sites that's enough
> > (especially
> > > > >>>> outside a 'user' area). If there's a static form, submitting it
> > would
> > > > >>>> pass back to Tapestry for processing.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I'd see this as only improving performance if you run Tapestry
> > behind
> > > > >>>> something like Apache. Granted, you'd get a lot of "that's not fair
> > -
> > > > >>>> you're not comparing our framework to yours if you don't hit your
> > > > >>>> framework more than once when we have to hit ours every time"
> > > > >>>> comments... but hey ;-)
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> My .02
> > > > >>>> Brian
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> The basic AOP  infrastructure is coming along. I expect the rest
> > to
> > > > >>>>>> ramp up pretty quickly once I get that in place, but we're still
> > > > >>>>>> talking months.  Maybe a useable beta by year's end.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> I think I predicted a big performance boost for Tapestry 4 apps
> > vs.
> > > > >>>>>> equivalent Tapestry 3 apps.  I believe the difference between 4
> > and 5
> > > > >>>>>> will be greater. In fact, I expect OGNL support to be an add on,
> > and
> > > > >>>>>> the built-in code will be an improved version of tapestry-prop
> > (from
> > > > >>>>>> Tapestry @ JavaForge).  I want Tapestry to be extremely high
> > > > >>>>>> performance, as one of its differentiators from JSF and Rails.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
> > > >
> > > > iD8DBQFET7DVaCoPKRow/gARAmKhAJ9nMufXCvQOfoKYMD1z0rLydvLlSwCfdLF1
> > > > 2kVbZyicMJD9mG/fxIZDMoQ=
> > > > =ZDag
> > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Howard M. Lewis Ship
> > > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
> > > Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
> > > Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
> > >
> > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
> > > and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net
> > Blog:                  http://jroller.com/page/glongman
> > Other interests:  http://www.squidoo.com/spaceelevator/
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net
> Blog:                  http://jroller.com/page/glongman
> Other interests:  http://www.squidoo.com/spaceelevator/
>


--
The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net
Blog:                  http://jroller.com/page/glongman
Other interests:  http://www.squidoo.com/spaceelevator/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to