I didn't explain sufficiently. Tapestry will always be application server agnostic; I want to just get Tapestry bundled with JBoss. There's some interest from the JBoss camp, I just haven't had time to build the JMX console. Meanwhile, the JBoss guys are working on their own console (using just servlets) so who know what will happen.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 9:08 AM Subject: Re: Long Term Plans for Tapestry > Thanks for the quick reply. > > You mentioned including it in JBoss, for my 2 cents I > would probably feel better if it were app server > agnostic. > > I think that this technology can easily stand on its > own. For instance we are a Weblogic shop. > > Having said that I can't even begin to understand the > politics etc that one has to go through with these > organizations, such as Jakarta etc. > > Either way your framework is my selection for our next > project, and as I pointed out to my colleague (who is > leaning towards Struts), if worse comes to worse you > include the source code > > Thanks again and take care. > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I don't seem me losing interest though I do see > > Tapestry > > competing with my other interests (including > > Sabertooth > > and real life). > > > > I'm doing everything I can, as an independant > > contributor, to push Tapestry into a community, not > > solo, effort. > > > > This is beginning to bear some fruit, as some users > > are > > finding bugs and providing fixes even today. > > > > I fully expect to continue using and improving > > Tapestry > > as long as I create web applications in Java ... > > maybe > > longer. > > > > Sun has shown no interest in taking code from > > individual > > developers; they've turned me down for even auditor > > access to JSR-127, and turned me down twice for > > sessions > > at JavaOne. The magic of open source is that Sun > > isn't > > all that relevant to the future of Tapestry. Sun > > doesn't like to admit mistakes, and will layer more > > garbage on top of JSPs rather than face the fact > > that > > JSPs are a flawed and limited model. Meanwhile, > > Tapestry is agile and free to evolve quickly. Did I > > > > just get onto a rant? > > > > > > > > I will *always* keep Tapestry as open-source, using > > the > > LGPL license or equivalent. > > > > > > > > That's more of a guarantee than you can get, even > > for > > software you paid for! The best guarantee is to do > > everything you can to grow the community ... turn as > > > > many people onto Tapestry as you can. > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > http://tapestry.sf.net > > > Hi Howard, > > > > > > as I indicated in my previous email, I am very > > > impressed with your Tapestry framework. > > > > > > Quite frankly I have been looking for something > > like > > > this for some time, however in mentioning it to > > one of > > > my colleagues, he raised a valid point. > > > > > > That is, what are your long term plans for this > > > framework. > > > > > > We all know there are no guarantees, but let's say > > for > > > whatever reason your level of interest wanes, what > > > then? > > > > > > Do you intend at some point to submit it to Sun or > > > Jakarta etc? > > > > > > Thanks again. > > > > > > > > > ===== > > > Cheers, > > > Stavros > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free > > > http://sbc.yahoo.com > > > ===== > Cheers, > Stavros > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free > http://sbc.yahoo.com > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek No, I will not fix your computer. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Tapestry-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer
