Any proposal for a new web app framework is vetoed there. They have Struts already and do not need any new framework. Forget about it :-)
Ara. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:tapestry- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 6:44 PM > To: Mind Bridge > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Tapestry-developer] Re: Long Term Plans for Tapestry > > I floated the idea of Tapestry as part of Jakarta in > 2000 ... before I moved it onto SourceForge. > > I got shot down ... they basically said that Tapestry > was a flawed version of Turbine and I shouldn't be > forking things. > > Without source code, there was little for them to > compare it to and they wouldn't have known me from Adam, > but I think we all know that Tapestry is not Turbine. > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://tapestry.sf.net > > > > Hi Howard, > > > > Sun has shown no interest in taking code from individual > > developers; they've turned me down for even auditor > > access to JSR-127, and turned me down twice for sessions > > at JavaOne. > > > > It seems to me that the JCP is pretty much closed to people/companies > who are > > not members and do not have influence on the Executive Committees. In > other > > words, it appears that the only way for open source projects to > influence the > > process in one way or another, no matter how great they are, passes > through the > > Apache Jakarta project. > > > > If the voting on JSR-127 is any indication, it also appears that Apache > are > > fairly protective of their own turf (Struts), and are apparently > oblivious to > > its faults. > > > > I am curious, have you ever talked to them about Tapestry? Would joining > them be > > an acceptable proposition (since it would most certainly bring instant > > additional recognition of Tapestry)? I admit that I don't know much > about the > > fine details of the situation, so I don't have a personal opinion either > way. > > > > Btw, does anyone actually know anything more specific about JSF? In the > docs > > they put out they talk about components, but also talk about JSP and tag > > libraries. That looks like a weird mix (Tapestry with JSP-based > templates? Hrm.) > > > > -mb > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > Do You Yahoo!? > New! SBC Yahoo! Dial - 1st Month Free & unlimited access > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > No, I will not fix your computer. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Tapestry-developer mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Tapestry-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer
