-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 All,
Let me use some recent past events to predict the future. >>>>>>> 1. The Reply-To header now points to the list >>>>>>> (how did I overlook that)? >>>>>> >>>>>> [Some argument against reply-to-list] >>>>> >>>>> [Some counter-argument] >>>> >>>> [Some counter-counter-argument] >>> >>> [Some red-herring] >> >> [Many repetitions of the above with the same or >> different arguments] > > [Many annoyed people] And now let me attempt to prevent my prediction from coming true. Please guys, let's not rehash this argument here. It has been had on virtually every mailing list in existence. There are good reasons for both reply-to-list and reply-to-all as the default behaviour. In the end (after all the technical quibbling and getting on one's high horse), when it comes down to it, it's just a matter of personal preference. Some people prefer one and some prefer another. Let's just pick one and then leave it. It Marty wants to hold a vote then fine. If not, can we just drop it? Please! Andrew -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBPmx/TgXqoqbqowOrEQJkrwCggfIkezFppnx02zBzSXj1+mN6KUkAn0IN PAPjFRjPYUNWe+wdECAGbwc7 =ndjQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---- : The tarproxy-list mailing list is archived at : http://www.mail-archive.com/tarproxy-list%40martiansoftware.com/ : : To unsubscribe from this list, follow the instructions at : http://www.martiansoftware.com/contact.html : : TarProxy's project page can be found at : http://www.martiansoftware.com/tarproxy
