On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 07:16, Samuel Liddicott wrote: > However (and not wanting to start a meta argument) Marty's initial comment > indicated he was not aware of reasons not to but thought it should always be > done, so it is fair to express the counter view.
Totally. I hadn't encountered that before. I see where the author is coming from, but I can't say I agree 100%. Anyone with strong feelings on the subject can vote by midnight on Tuesday, March 11 (Eastern). Then it will stay or go. I vote to keep it the way it is. :) - Marty -- Marty Lamb Martian Software <mlamb at martiansoftware dot com> ---- : The tarproxy-list mailing list is archived at : http://www.mail-archive.com/tarproxy-list%40martiansoftware.com/ : : To unsubscribe from this list, follow the instructions at : http://www.martiansoftware.com/contact.html : : TarProxy's project page can be found at : http://www.martiansoftware.com/tarproxy
