Hi Goncalo, On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 14:15:19 [GMT +0000] (which was 7:15 AM where I live) you wrote: GF> It's part of the new era. RITLabs surely won't straighten up the GF> usage of email, they must go along with the major players and the GF> major players do have GOOD HTML support.
So if your friend jumps off a bridge, you're going to do it too? Remember Opera? They refused to improperly render HTML pages due to sloppy markup. They caught flack over it for sure, but they stuck to their guns. They're still very popular. The reason other "players" have good HTML support is that these other player also write browsers. They implement their browser into their e-mail product. Do I have anything against TB writing their own browser... Nope. Would I rather they spend the time making TB a better and more solid product for *e-mail*. Definitely. GF> If I had the same attitude that a few other showed up I would say GF> something like "I don't use IMAP, I don't care if it has bugs or GF> not I rather have HTML rendered correctly" but I find both things GF> important. IMAP is part of e-mail. HTML isn't. Poor argument. -- Leif -:- TB Lists Moderator -:- PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F Tagline of the day: A BIG ROCK>>>>>>me<<<<<<A HARD PLACE Roguemoticons - http://www.PCWize.com/thebat PCWSmileys - http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/