Hi Avi, On 23/5/2005 7:12 PM +0700, you wrote: > Allie, I never before saw Shakespeare get such a bad reaction. :-) > Anyway, perhaps you misunderstood.
I don't think so. My reaction wasn't one of being upset or anything related to that. It was quite an emotion free response. Just a candid one really. After this clarifying message, I still have the same position. > All I meant to say was that on this list alone I see many people > praising IMAP to the sky and the same people getting caught up in > lengthy discussions about IMAP problems. Well, your response explains it. If we have high praises about it, this means that we find using the protocol to be extremely useful. It's only natural then that we'll discuss at length, the problems we're having with it. The very same happens concerning other aspects of TB!. You could replace 'IMAP' with 'TB!' in your statement, and someone looking in, wondering what the fuss with TB! is about, could be saying the same thing. Of course, we know better and fully understand why TB! is discussed so much and why so much time is put into it, right? We see the returns. Returns that are determined/affected by our personal needs and preferences and tastes. :) -- Allie Martin System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm -=-=- Oxymoron: Restless Sleep. ________________________________________________________ Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
