Hello James, On Tuesday, 07 July 2005 at 08:04 AM you (James (Jay) Walker), also known as Avi, wrote:
>> I'm familiar with it, but TB! doesn't use that system. Never has. Why >> should it now?? > Perhaps to be more clear and hence more user-friendly. Perhaps to > conform with a popular international standard. I'm feeling the same, the numbering system should be more user-friendly. The question is, if there are really international standards?! No, there aren't, are there? The only international standard which implies user-friendliness is to have consistency. So I (we?) really would like to have one clear system, nothing more. If that is v3.50 -> v3.51-> v3.60 or v3.5b1 -> v3.5b10 or v3.50.01 -> v3.50.10 doesn't really matter to me. But the system should proof that each TB! user could determine which version is the newest and why it's like that. > Or could it be just your time of the month? Now I've had the time of my life.... No I never felt like this before. ;-) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
