Sveiki, > Vilius,
>>> I guess I am going to have to disagree with that. TB Imap is not >>> perfect, but it is the pick of my list which includes: >> Execuse me, but TB!'s IMAP is a crap. It's not even in alpha stage. In >> fact I haven't seen worse IMAP implementation. My students at >> university write better IMAP code in 4 to 6 weeks than Ritlabs did it >> in 4 years. > Interesting. What I see is that every single Imap client out there is > either incomplete (like Thunderbird) or has problems worse than TB. I > have heard from a well known email client programmer that this > probably has something to do with the fact that the Imap specification > is enormous. Actually it's not. If you want to implement simple pure IMAP4 without any extensions (such as sieve, ACL's, list extensions, etc.) you can do it in couple of weeks. I already told you that _students_ does it in 6. And by the way I'm using Office 2007 and Outlook Express at work at the moment and as a long time IMAP user (like 7 years), I still think that their IMAP is superior (I'm not talking about other their stuff though). Thunderbird is incomplete, but the commands implemented there works like a sharm. I don't have to swich through folders or clear the cache everytime I want to see the message at least. -- Best regards, Vilius ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
