Mike,
> TBird is not glitter. It is a barebones, functional IMAP/POP client. Right, barebones. But click on an account heading, or local folders. No, I think the glitter is there. > You can glitz it up with themes and extensions, but the program itself > is simple, Right. > it works and the average person can slide right into it. > That is the appeal, the learning curve is not steep. Glitter, now your > talking Pocomail. Yes. And functionally crippled by poor implementation and bugginess in the case of Poco. > Unfortunately for RITLabs, (other than the fact that they have a crappy > web site), they do not seem to be marketing towards the commercial > sector very heavily. I wonder how it was that seemingly everybody all at once became aware of Firebird/Thunderbird. I remember a techie friend in the early days of Firebird saying that it was superior because it introduced tabs. He didn't seem to think that Netscape had tabs. Never heard of Opera. So what was the secret? How did Moz get noticed? -- Gleason Using 3.99.25 on Windows XP, 5.1, Build 2600. IMAP email provider is Fastmail, which uses Cyrus server software. ________________________________________________________ Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
