-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

  On Sat, 21 Oct 2000 09:22:40 -0700, Ming-Li wrote:

>> And  when  an alternative was  offered to a  rule it  was this
>> rule *or* this alternative  or  this  alternative,  etc.

ML> That's right!

Indeed.

>> What's the difference between  what I  set  up & what you  set
>> up?

ML> Let's simplify it and see if it helps. Your original filter is like
ML> this:

ML> Rule move messages to folder trash

ML> Strings   Location    Present
ML> A         recipient   no

ML> Alternatives
ML> B         recipient   no
ML> C         recipient   no

ML> So logically it's

ML> IF (not A) OR ((not B) AND (not C)) THEN move to trash

Actually it's :
IF (not A) OR ((not B) OR (not C)) THEN move to trash

Once you place a string in the alternatives area it's an OR string
match that's done.

I have a single filter setup for my friends for instance. Whenever I
wish to filter someones mail to my friends folder, I just add their
e-mail address as a filter string under the alternative section. Hence
*any* single e-mail address in the alternatives section will trigger the
filter.

The only way to produce an and effect is to add filter strings to the
'filter strings' section under the Rules section.

ML> See? "OR" is used between rule sets (the main rule set and the
ML> alternative rule set), while "AND" is used between the two rules in
ML> the alternative rule sets.

ML> Let's resolve it to:

ML> IF (not A) OR (not (B OR C)) THEN move to trash

But this is right. :-) Hmmm, is that the same as what you originally
wrote above? <g> Didn't seem so to me. <sigh>

ML> Here the first OR is the original one linking two rule sets, and
ML> the second OR is because we take the "NOT" outside.

ML> Let's further resolve it to:

ML> IF not (A AND (B OR C)) THEN move to trash

ML> and further:

ML> IF (A AND (B OR C)) THEN DON'T move to trash

ML> which is:

ML> IF (A and B) OR (A and C) THEN DON'T move to trash

LOL! What?!! Now I'm confused. :-)

[rest snipped and not read in case I get more confused. :-)

ML> To avoid confusion, I suggest don't use the "|" together with "No"
ML> in Presence. (Some would advice avoiding "|", period, which is a
ML> fine suggestion. I personally use it, for it's convenient. But be
ML> sure you know what TB would do with it.)

Now *that's* not confusing and a good suggestion. However, in my
experience with these filters, his present rule would be equivalent.

- --
A. Curtis Martin..
Moderator TBUDL/TBBETA  |  PGP Key ID: 0xEE079937
PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey
- ---
** "PARANOID:Paying MORE for Surge-Protectors than Computers "
________________________________________________________
Using TB! v1.47 Beta/7 (S/N CCA4F9B8) «» Win2k Pro SP1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for sender verification.

iQA/AwUBOfHOQPAXeSHuB5k3EQLv8ACeNoEqiEsV8FpKb8EAchQPPW1hdpIAoIo5
DfCD7Zl5+rHikNq5qvnEAv20
=Qs1q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org


Reply via email to