On Friday, January 05, 2001, 7:46:11 AM, Kari wrote:
ML>> That should work, as you've found out. The only "drawback" of
ML>> that approach is an DOS instance (window) for the batch would
ML>> stay there the whole time TB is active. It's no big deal, just
ML>> something I always try to avoid.
> I posted a solution and a complete How-To just five minutes ago.
> Thank you for your effort.
I saw it. But I was talking about the "instance" of the shell, not
the visibility of the window. But as I said, it's just a petty thing
I try to avoid. I'm glad it works out for you.
--
Best regards,
Ming-Li
The Bat! 1.49 Beta/2 | Win2k SP1
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
