-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul,
@29 April 2002, 07:51:38 -0400 (12:51 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I'm new to both TB and PGP. Would it be any better to install gpg ? > would I gain/lose any TB capabilitites using gpg over PGP6.5.8 ? The way I see it is this: GPG is smaller and tighter than PGP. In many ways, I prefer PGP 6.5.8 ckt, but I don't like the use of the PGPLog window for showing the result of verification operations. I prefer the GPG system where the results are shown in a pop-up text window from which the results can be copied and pasted back. Between ckt and GPG, I don't see much difference in level of functionality. ckt is clearly slicker. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQE8zTp+OeQkq5KdzaARAsdAAJ9QyeF6nyFWcfDKgKDXA0iLZZvSfACfQ0Sy O2a1/dDQkoasXEx9KybOUnQ= =Co6b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
