Hello Thomas, in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] was written:
TF> No. You got me wrong here: I do not have a single spam filter in TB. I TF> have filters for all legit mail. What stays in the *Inbox* is either TF> spam, or a first contact that hasn't been added to any of the other TF> filters yet (and could be called a false positive). the very same I did, but then came the many aliases putting all their mail into the same mail box (simply to differ you gets which e-mail-address w/o creating to many 'real' account :-))) ). So some spam end up in aliases folder over here ... TF> If, however, you are the postmaster of an ISP Not necessarily an ISP ... I'm postmaster, webmaster, admin-c, tech-c and so on for several hosts and domains ... w/o us being an ISP :-) TF> my method will not be sufficient for you and you might want to look TF> into spamfilters. Exactly :-) TF> For me it would be an overkill, whether I use Bayes' Theorem or TF> Einstein's Relativity Theory. What about 'Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle'? Ain't there some 'uncertainty' about if the bold letters indicate 'new legitimate mail' or spam? *SCNR* TF> For 'fighting spam' I use SpamCop. ;-) So I do ... in addition to first 'quarantining' possible spam for better diversion between which folder to finish reading and which one to handle afterwards :-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.62/Beta1 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2) If you don't say "What?" it's not loud enough. ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
