On 10/22/2002, Joseph N. wrote:

> While the division of forums (fora?) which Anne suggested could be helpful
> in some ways, I'm concerned that it would exacerbate the big problem with
> the message board idea to begin with: more time and effort. There would be
> more links to click to view messages, essentially the *opposite* of having
> them all in a TB folder threaded by reference so they can be eyeballed
> quickly and at one time. Plus, there is the concern, which was discussed
> in the course of Anne's earlier post about a different list, that
> discussions of one topic often morph into, or are pertinent to, other
> topics. So, this would be a vote against too many separate forums, and,
> instead, in favor of fewer forums with good topic identification practices
> and threading of replies.


That's the route I'd be inclined to take... just a handful of forums, no
more than five or six.

-- 
Regards,
Don Zeigler
* bringing you boring sigfiles for over 14 years *

...I know everything. I just can't remember it all at once.

www.donzeigler.com  |  This message brought to you by The Bat v1.61


________________________________________________
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to