Hello neurowerx, you wrote: > I wonder why many people are using Bayes filtering as the only measure > again spam. 95% of the spam I get is being caught by SpamPal "alone" (DNS > blacklist feature). I only use the Bayesian plugin to Spampal as an > addition (the few mails that get thru first place make training it very > easy).
I just figured out that you can "right-click" the SpamPal tray icon and select "plug-in" and then choose "Bayesian Filter" and you are provided with an easy to use interface for reclassifying emails. All this time I've been Saving the erring e-mail to a special folder, then opening SpamPal, then clicking on plug-ins, then Bayesian, then properties then import messages.... That was the only reason I was using PopFile, was that I thought it was easier to train it. But imagine my surprise... Now I have to say, without a doubt, that SpamPal is better than PopFile. SpamPal also makes less mistakes than PopFile. -- John Morse pagemaker -at- semo -dot- net ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
