Hello Leif, Friday, October 3, 2003, 3:38:41 PM, you wrote:
LG> Hello Marck, LG> Friday, October 3, 2003, 5:33:19 AM, you wrote: MDP>> I am personally indifferent about the cut mark rule but Leif is MDP>> not and I support him fully, mostly for the reason I just stated. LG> Ouch, I'm the bad guy! <grin> LG> Again, not using a cut mark was something we've already tried. Just a suggestion, if it has been tried before then apologies. On my lists hosted by EZMLM, I include the cutmark in the footer, so even if there is no cut mark, then the footer gets trimmed anyway. It seems to work with TB, i.e, I have a proper cutmark in my messages, followed by the cutmark in the footer, both get trimmed off, as TB trimms everything after the first (my personal) cutmark. Is there a reason why this is not a good idea? Thanks, Andrew. -- Best regards, Andrew Hodgson, Bromyard, Herefordshire, UK. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.00.6 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
