Hello Thomas, This is what you said on Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:38:28 +0700 your time:
> Any new folder will be under (inside) the Inbox. when I realise that > the traffic is significant, it will be moved outside. Folders that are > outside might be moved inside if the traffic is little. That's different...well, to me I mean. > Reason is that high traffic folders are reacheed easier when they are > shown outside. I have foolders named 'Inbox - news', 'Inbox - voicemail', 'Inbox - fax' and 'Inbox - sms' directly under the account Inbox. Under them I have a folder called Lists, and inside them dedicated folders for lists. All my other folders are grouped and nested below them in the account tree. So yes, I get that, as I have moved all the busier folders just below the Inbox. > However, too many folders shown outside makes the account tree view too > long, and a lot of scrolling is involved, so low-traffic folders are > better located under the Inbox. Yeah, that's the problem with the folder metaphor though. I can't stop creating related folders and new categories. I'm always pruning and merging groups so that the scrolling and navigation is less cumbersome. ;-) > I use Incoming filters (and Outgoing filters, should be combined...) > rather than Read filters. I have a feeling your paradigm favours Read > filters. >From what I posted I can see why you came to that conclusion. It does rather indicate that I use read filters. However, I don't really, preferring to use incoming and outgoing filtering and manually sorting / deleting other stuff that is left. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #24383. Rig Owe New Hods? ¶ TB! 4.2.6 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________ Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
