Hello Ian,

Saturday, May 22, 2010, 4:17:51 PM, you wrote:

> G'day MFPA,

> On Sunday, May 23, 2010, at 8:45:34 AM, you (MFPA) wrote:

>>> Server-side is better anyway: No need to download all
>>> the spam messages.  

M>> And, presumably, no way to rescue messages falsely categorised as 
M>> spam.

> It is a major disadvantage of server-side spam filtering and why I 
> have disabled this with my ISP.

> The big advantage of Mailwasher is that you get to see a list of the 
> messages available and you can preview them if you like. It is you who
> then decides whether to download the entire message. If you do 
> inadvertently delete a legitimate message, you do have a recycle bin 
> where you can recover all or part of the message. If you cannot 
> recover the message body, you can at least contact the sender and ask 
> it be sent again.

> I am not in favour of ANY system that classifies the messages and acts
> on its own. I am currently in dispute with a client owing several 
> thousands of dollars. He uses Norton 360, and essentially you cannot 
> send him any e-mail that has a dollar sign in it, or refers to the 
> word dollar or any other terms that are part of an invoice. Norton 360
> automatically deletes them and he does not want to change any settings
> because he wants it to work that way. Basically this way he claims he 
> never received anything.

> Unfortunately, experience has shown that systems that automatically
> classify mail and then download and file them away in a spam or junk
> folder without any user intervention see the user rarely (if ever)
> checking the spam or junk folder which is then automatically purged.
> That being the case such systems are as bad as server-side filtering.

> The user needs to be in control, and even then there needs to be some 
> capability of recovery.


WOW!!! Thanks for everyone's input, this was all good info...!!!

-- 
Best regards,
 Tim                            mailto:timh...@cox.net


________________________________________________
Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to