Mo DeJong wrote:
> Ahh, but Tcl provides a portable locking layer when compiled with
> threads support. That is what I am sugesting we use for the mutex.
OK, I hadn't thought of that. (I am trying to augment my Java code with
Tcl, not the other way around... that colors my viewpoint a bit.)
> If we require Tcl thread support, we can get rid of the Java
> monitor used in JAVA_LOCK. Anything to avoid calling a JNI
> method is a plus in my book.
I agree. Good idea.
--
Jeff Sturm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------
The TclJava mailing list is sponsored by Scriptics Corporation.
To subscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word SUBSCRIBE as the subject.
To unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the subject.
To send to the list, send email to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
An archive is available at http://www.mail-archive.com/tcljava@scriptics.com
