So, pardon my desperation, but are you gentlemen going to save my job and give
me a TclBlend 1.2.5 patch to try out?
Jeff Sturm wrote:
> Mo DeJong wrote:
> > Ahh, but Tcl provides a portable locking layer when compiled with
> > threads support. That is what I am sugesting we use for the mutex.
>
> OK, I hadn't thought of that. (I am trying to augment my Java code with
> Tcl, not the other way around... that colors my viewpoint a bit.)
>
> > If we require Tcl thread support, we can get rid of the Java
> > monitor used in JAVA_LOCK. Anything to avoid calling a JNI
> > method is a plus in my book.
>
> I agree. Good idea.
>
> --
> Jeff Sturm
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> The TclJava mailing list is sponsored by Scriptics Corporation.
> To subscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with the word SUBSCRIBE as the subject.
> To unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the subject.
> To send to the list, send email to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
> An archive is available at http://www.mail-archive.com/tcljava@scriptics.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
The TclJava mailing list is sponsored by Scriptics Corporation.
To subscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word SUBSCRIBE as the subject.
To unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the subject.
To send to the list, send email to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
An archive is available at http://www.mail-archive.com/tcljava@scriptics.com
