I obviously support tcpcrypt too and want to add based on Marcelo's note that I'm available to promptly make any changes to the current implementation and work toward upstreaming kernel patches based on the working group's outcome.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:55 AM, marcelo bagnulo braun <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just to add, it would ne nice if people expressing support for one draft > or the other also state whether you are willing to: > - review the different versions of the draft > - contribute with text to the draft > - produce code/implement the protocol > > Thanks, marcelo > > > El 16/03/15 a las 16:43, marcelo bagnulo braun escribió: > > We would like to ask the WG to express their support to adopt one (or >> none) of the following documents as WG document that will serve as a >> basis for the protocol specification. Of course, the draft, if >> adopted, will need to updated according to the WG input. In >> particular, they need to be updated to not protect the TCP header. >> >> >> The candidate drafts are: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt/ >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tcpinc-tls-option/ >> >> We plan to discuss this on the meeting but it would be useful to start >> the discussion before the meeting, so if you can express your opinions >> before the meeting, it would be helpful. >> >> Regards, marcelo (on behalf of the co chairs) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tcpinc mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Tcpinc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc >
_______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
