Just to add, it would ne nice if people expressing support for one draft
or the other also state whether you are willing to:
- review the different versions of the draft
- contribute with text to the draft
- produce code/implement the protocol
Thanks, marcelo
El 16/03/15 a las 16:43, marcelo bagnulo braun escribió:
We would like to ask the WG to express their support to adopt one (or
none) of the following documents as WG document that will serve as a
basis for the protocol specification. Of course, the draft, if
adopted, will need to updated according to the WG input. In
particular, they need to be updated to not protect the TCP header.
The candidate drafts are:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tcpinc-tls-option/
We plan to discuss this on the meeting but it would be useful to start
the discussion before the meeting, so if you can express your opinions
before the meeting, it would be helpful.
Regards, marcelo (on behalf of the co chairs)
_______________________________________________
Tcpinc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
_______________________________________________
Tcpinc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
