(B) because I can use it, in a kernel (FreeBSD) environment, and I like its simple approach to authentication. It provides a broader base of applicability--not just userspace connections.
Craig ----- Reply message ----- From: "Martin Stiemerling" <mls.i...@gmail.com> To: "tcpinc@ietf.org" <tcpinc@ietf.org> Subject: [tcpinc] CORRECTION: Reminder: Ongoing Working Group Last Call about drafts to choose as WG item Date: Fri, Jul 24, 2015 11:17 AM Dear all, **Please use this CORRECTED version, as one option to choose from below didn't make it into the original.**** Thanks to Erik Rescola for pointing this out to me directly. This point got lost on the mailing list, but it has been decided in the WG session here at IETF-93 that there will be a Last Call for consensus about which document of the below ones to take as starting point for the WG. Here are the two drafts: a) draft-rescorla-tcpinc-tls-option-03 b) draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-03 Please respond to the tcpinc wg mailing list until July 31st, 2015 1pm CEST on wether you prefer - either draft a) or b) - both drafts (a & b) as WG items - or none to be accepted as WG item(s). Please write also your brief reasoning on why you made your choice. Please note that accepting a draft is not the end of working on the technical content of the draft, but it is actually the starting point when the WG has full change control about the content of the draft! Regards, Martin Stiemerling Transport Area Director _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list Tcpinc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
_______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list Tcpinc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc