On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:44:07AM -0500, Alex Goncharov wrote: > But: > > man -S N STRING > > to work, and > > man -S N -k STRING > > not?...
I think you're looking for man -s, which works fine. I didn't even know -S existed. It seems that the problem is that -S is defined somewhat differently for man and apropos; I have no idea which one of them (if either) is wrong, but it certainly violates the principle of least surprise the way it is. Please file a PR. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
