On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:14:57AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > > > I consider lfs second-class citizen at this time and if forward > > > compat if broken for the lfs module on the branch it's probably not > > > a big deal). > > > > I don't consider that acceptable... > > So, because of modules, we can't pullup new features to netbsd-6 ?
How is this different from netbsd-5? -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org