On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:14:57AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
 > >  > I consider lfs second-class citizen at this time and if forward
 > >  > compat if broken for the lfs module on the branch it's probably not
 > >  > a big deal).
 > > 
 > > I don't consider that acceptable...
 > 
 > So, because of modules, we can't pullup new features to netbsd-6 ?

How is this different from netbsd-5?

-- 
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org

Reply via email to