On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 06:10:21PM +0000, David Holland wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:14:57AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > > > > I consider lfs second-class citizen at this time and if forward > > > > compat if broken for the lfs module on the branch it's probably not > > > > a big deal). > > > > > > I don't consider that acceptable... > > > > So, because of modules, we can't pullup new features to netbsd-6 ? > > How is this different from netbsd-5?
Modules are not used by default on netbsd-5 AFAIK. On netbsd-6 options MUODULAR is in i386 GENERIC, but it seems filesystem modules are all compiled in by default. I'm not sure what other modules would be affected by a change to struct buf ... -- Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org> NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference --