Taylor R Campbell <campbell+netbsd-tech-k...@mumble.net> wrote: > Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 17:27:01 +0100 > From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rm...@netbsd.org> > > Should be fine, but once tmpfs is switched to use vcache, it might > become a little bit more visible for some workloads.. > > Why switch tmpfs to use vcache? That would add memory and time > overhead for no reason. struct tmpfs_node already has a map from key > to vnode -- the tn_vnode field. No need to manage an rb tree to > accomplish the same thing.
Err.. yes. I seem to forget conceptual details quickly after not working on a codebase for a while. We have in-memory inodes after all, duh! :) -- Mindaugas
