Christos Zoulas wrote: > >That should take care of the failing network related tests that contain > >rump.route commands, but that's not all of the failing tests. > > Thanks! I fixed that now. Let's see how many break after this...
413 on my bare metal testbed (20 steps forward, 202 steps back): http://www.gson.org/netbsd/bugs/build/amd64-baremetal/commits-2020.04.html#2020.04.02.21.36.03 There have also been other commits since the previous run, so these changes in test outcomes may not all be due to your sbin/route commits. -- Andreas Gustafsson, g...@gson.org