On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 12:03:03PM -0400, jrandom at i2p.net wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > Well of course, if it is easy to find all nodes, then there is little > > > > point in building in heavy anonymity once you're on the network. That > > > > was the whole motive behind the 0.7 darknet! > > > > > > Agreed. > > > > > > Just to clarify, "easy" there means both less expensive than attacking > > > the anonymity techniques of Freenet/dark (aka (1)) and within the > > > capabilities of an intent attacker. > > > > Within the capabilities of a talented 13 year old with a spare > > afternoon, in fact. > > Well, some attacks on Freenet/dark's (2) are easy for a state level > adversary, but beyond the capabilities of most talented 13 year olds > I know ;)
For example? -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20051011/730b1457/attachment.pgp>
