-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > However, before going on to build a more clear analysis of the costs > > necessary to detect such communication, humor me - assuming that cost > > to attack (2) is less than the cost of (1), do you agree that further > > improvements upon (1) is immaterial to the practical anonymity of those > > who require Freenet/dark?
> Well of course, if it is easy to find all nodes, then there is little > point in building in heavy anonymity once you're on the network. That > was the whole motive behind the 0.7 darknet! Agreed. Just to clarify, "easy" there means both less expensive than attacking the anonymity techniques of Freenet/dark (aka (1)) and within the capabilities of an intent attacker. Ian - do you concur? =jr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDS9h3WYfZ3rPnHH0RAiblAKCJcf5ihTNiAKBXBxw2+HaaXzW4GACeNkqL JuquWAGDSedunoKLOzhHaHY= =CbSK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
