On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 10:14:35AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 25 May 2006, at 09:29, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > >On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 09:10:14AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > >> > >>Essentially I think the question is whether it is really such a bad > >>thing if C can mislead its neighbors into thinking that it is > >>inserting when it really isn't. What is the worst case scenario > >>here? > > > >That all your inserts fail, and you don't know about it. > > This would require that: > > - You had chosen to trust someone that was dropping all your inserts > - You were routing all inserts to that person > > To the extent that this is a problem, I think it is a problem outside > the scope of load balancing.
Agreed. We should detect it, but it's not a load balancing issue. > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060525/ce550cca/attachment.pgp>
