-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Of course, but if we are to have someone focus specifically on load balancing over the summer, then this should be part of what they do.
Ian. On 25 May 2006, at 10:47, Matthew Toseland wrote: > It's a low priority item, as I've explained. Incentives are important, > but there are more urgent matters. > > On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 10:44:50AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: >> >> On 25 May 2006, at 10:18, Matthew Toseland wrote: >>> Agreed. We should detect it, but it's not a load balancing issue. >> >> Ok, so does this mean that we can agree that we can apply my "network >> debt" proposal to inserts - even though it doesn't account for the >> possibility of deliberately dropped inserts (we can mitigate against >> this later with some kind of low-probability inserts verification)? >> >> Don't forget, people are supposed to be able to trust their immediate >> peers not to do things like drop inserts... >> >> Ian. > -- > Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org > Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ > ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEdfvqQtgxRWSmsqwRAt3+AJ9KWFl7h53KyfdsqEsnsoAEQLvD6wCfVGlq 2Lm8X8RHVSnf28l2uJR0m1o= =a8z0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
