-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 25 May 2006, at 10:18, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Agreed. We should detect it, but it's not a load balancing issue. Ok, so does this mean that we can agree that we can apply my "network debt" proposal to inserts - even though it doesn't account for the possibility of deliberately dropped inserts (we can mitigate against this later with some kind of low-probability inserts verification)? Don't forget, people are supposed to be able to trust their immediate peers not to do things like drop inserts... Ian. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEde0TQtgxRWSmsqwRAv67AJ98uaU+O4PaPMkcMllf7UjvLIZpHQCfc7u5 Pvm4RoblhXq1UiI1wFTHx9k= =bMlX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
