Editing the device names after the fact is fine for my usage. On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> wrote: >> I guess as long as /etc/fstab continues to support non-DUID device >> names, it can be manually edited after the initial system build. > > Of course the non-DUID device names will continue working. > > OK, this seems like a conversation with people who never read > the code to see how DUID works. What a waste of words.
- Re: Do you need/prefer the non-DUID opti... Stuart Henderson
- Re: Do you need/prefer the non-DUID opti... Michael W. Lucas
- Re: Do you need/prefer the non-DUID ... patrick keshishian
- Re: Do you need/prefer the non-DUID option in... Theo de Raadt
- Re: Do you need/prefer the non-DUID option in... Theo de Raadt
- Re: Do you need/prefer the non-DUID opti... Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
- Re: Do you need/prefer the non-DUID option in... Theo de Raadt
- Re: Do you need/prefer the non-DUID option in... Theo de Raadt
- Re: Do you need/prefer the non-DUID option in... Kenneth Westerback
- Re: Do you need/prefer the non-DUID option in... dan mclaughlin
- Re: Do you need/prefer the non-DUID option in... Bob Beck
- Re: Do you need/prefer the non-DUID option in... Theo de Raadt
- Re: Do you need/prefer the non-DUID opti... frantisek holop
- Re: Do you need/prefer the non-DUID ... Joel Sing
- Re: Do you need/prefer the non-D... frantisek holop