At 1:35 PM -0500 1/18/06, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
Actually, I think it would make more sense for the IRB to vet errata for independently published documents (ones they approved in the first place) and for the IETF (either the pertinent WG if it still exists, or the area directors?) to vet technical errata to IETF publications.
Sounds fine. That leaves out the independently published documents that were approved by the RFC Editor before the IRB appeared, but the number of errata for those is probably quite small and can be handled by the IRB as well.
--Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
