Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
I agree with Leslie here.
We all agree it's a distinct topic. I would tend to argue for it
being in techspec scope, because I don't see where else it can
be discussed, but I suspect Leslie disagrees.
Brian
Bert-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Leslie Daigle Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 01:16 To: Brian E Carpenter Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Techspec] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-mankin-pub-req-03.txt I *assume* individual submissions that go to an AD are considered IETF technical specifications (otherwise, why is the IESG spending time on them?). So then, Brian E Carpenter wrote:3.13. Exception Handling...o Current Req-EXCEPTIONS-2 - The IETF technicalpublisher shouldhave the discretion to reject publication of an independent submission based upon feedback from reviewers.I don't think this is properly called an exception, and I think it very much over-simplifies the issue - see my earlier message on this topic.Req-EXCEPTIONS-2 doesn't belong in this document, as far as I can tell.Leslie. _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
_______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
