I agree with Leslie here. Bert
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Leslie Daigle > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 01:16 > To: Brian E Carpenter > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Techspec] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-mankin-pub-req-03.txt > > > > I *assume* individual submissions that go to an AD > are considered IETF technical specifications (otherwise, > why is the IESG spending time on them?). > > So then, > > Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > >> 3.13. Exception Handling > > > > > > ... > > > >> o Current Req-EXCEPTIONS-2 - The IETF technical > publisher should > >> have the discretion to reject publication of an independent > >> submission based upon feedback from reviewers. > > > > > > I don't think this is properly called an exception, and I think it > > very much over-simplifies the issue - see my earlier message on > > this topic. > > > Req-EXCEPTIONS-2 doesn't belong in this document, as far as I > can tell. > > > Leslie. > > > _______________________________________________ > Techspec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec > _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
